中日大城市低收入保障房体系对比研究 英文2025|PDF|Epub|mobi|kindle电子书版本百度云盘下载

中日大城市低收入保障房体系对比研究 英文PDF格式电子书版下载

注意：本站所有压缩包均有解压码： 点击下载压缩包解压工具

Ⅰ RAISING THE ISSUE1

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION3

1.1 RESEARCH BACK GROUND AND MOTIVATION3

1.1.1 Housing problem of low income population in metropolitan in China3

1.1.2 Housing security system in Japan from a vertical perspective11

1.1.3 Transition of housing security in the US from a horizontal perspective13

1.2 PURPOSE OF RESEARCH17

1.2.1 Establishing the reference model for comparison18

1.2.2 Identifying deficiencies and problem of current public housing supply system in China in comparison to that in Japan19

1.2.3 Clarify public housing supply target for the low income population for further study20

1.3 LITERATURE REVIEW20

1.3.1 Study on housing policy system20

1.3.2 Study on"Housing Poverty"problem28

1.3.3 Study on housing security policy system31

1.3.4 Study on public housing supply system36

1.3.5 Study on specific public housing supply system40

1.3.6 Position of the research in academic field44

1.4 METHODOLOGY OF RESEARCH47

1.4.1 Chapter 2—Selectionofhousing securityinstrument47

1.4.2 Chapter 3—Selection of existing model of public housing supply as reference47

1.4.3 Chapter 4—Establishment of public housing supply comparison model between Japan and China48

1.4.4 Chapter 5—Comparison and reference of policy and institutionalsystem49

1.4.5 Chapter 6—Comparison and reference of housing construction method49

1.4.6 Chapter 7—Reflection of the public housing security target50

1.5 TERMINOLOGY52

1.5.1 Household registration system in China52

1.5.2 Terminology correlated with public housing53

1.6 COMPOSITIONOFRESEARCH55

Ⅱ COMPARISON FOUNDATION57

CHAPTER 2 COMPARISON OF HOUSING SECURITY INSTRUMENTS FOR LOW INCOME POPULATION IN COUNTRIES AROUND THE WORLD59

2.1 CHAPTER INTRODUCTION59

2.1.1 Collectionofsecondary and primary data60

2.1.2 Original research idea61

2.2 VERIFICATION OF COMPARABILITY OF HOUSING SECURITY INSTRUMENTS62

2.2.1 Similarities:market economic operation mode63

2.2.2 Differences in the specific category of market operation mode65

2.2.3 Section67

2.3 COMPARISON OF THE CORRELATED COMPONENTS:HOUSING SYSTEM67

2.3.1 The US:Market-relief housing system68

2.3.2 Sweden:Market-nationwide security housing system69

2.3.3 Germany:Conservative corporatist welfare housing system70

2.3.4 Singapore:government intervention housing system72

2.4 COMPARISON OF THE CORRELATED COMPONENTS:LANDSYSTEM74

2.4.1 Land tenure system74

2.4.2 Land usage system77

2.5 COMPARISON OF THE CORRELATED COMPONENTS:ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT78

2.5.1 Comparison of GDP78

2.5.2 Comparison of per capita income79

2.5.3 ComparisonofGDP growth80

2.5.4 Comparison of Engel Coefficient82

2.6 COMPARISON OF HOUSING SECURITY INSTRUMENTS83

2.6.1 Mortgage-interest deduction85

2.6.2 Privatization of public housing87

2.6.3 Rent control policy91

2.6.4 Rental assistance policy93

2.6.5 Public housing supply96

2.7 OBSERVATION OF THE CORRESPONDING COMPONENTS IN CHINA101

2.7.1 Economic operation modeinChina101

2.7.2 Current situation of housing policyin China104

2.7.3 Land system in China105

2.7.4 Economic development107

2.7.5 Selection of public housing supply112

2.8 CHAPTER CONCLUSION116

CHAPTER 3 COMPARISON OF MACROSCOPIC ENVIRONMENT OF PUBLIC HOUSING SUPPLY SYSTEM BETWEEN JAPAN AND CHINA119

3.1 CHAPTER INTRODUCTION119

3.1.1 Collection of secondary and primary data119

3.1.2 Original researchidea121

3.2 ELIMINATION OF IMPROPER OBSERVING OBJECTS121

3.2.1 Position of the government's task121

3.2.2 Dominant force122

3.2.3 Economic development123

3.2.4 Urbanization mode123

3.3 FURTHER EXAMINATION OF JAPAN BEING THE EXISTING MODEL FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF ECONOMIC FIELD BY VERIFICATION OF COMPARABILITY124

3.3.1 Similar international environment125

3.3.2 Similar development strategy126

3.3.3 Similar economic problems128

3.4 FURTHER EXAMINATION OF JAPANBEING THE EXISTING MODEL FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF METROPOLITAN AREA BY VERIFICATION OF COMPARABILITY129

3.4.1 Similar rapid urbanization129

3.4.2 Similar population migration to metropolitan area131

3.4.3 Similar increasing of housing price133

3.5 FURTHER EXAMINATION OFJAPAN BEING THE EXISTING MODEL FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THEROLE OF"WORLD FACTORY"135

3.5.1 Observation on different types of World Factory from a historical perspective136

3.5.2 Characteristics of World Factory141

3.5.3 China:potential capability of being the fourth World Factory142

3.6 ERA IN JAPAN MATCHING TO CURRENT CHINA IN THE SENSE OF TIMELINE144

3.6.1 The stage of public housing development in Japan144

3.6.2 The stage of public housing development in China147

3.6.3 Era in Japan matching to current China150

3.7 CHAPTER CONCLUSION151

CHAPTER 4 ESTABLISHMENT OF PUBLIC HOUSING SUPPLY COMPARISON MODEL BETWEEN JAPAN AND CHINA153

4.1 CHAPTER INTRODUCTION153

4.1.1 Collection of secondary data and primarydata153

4.1.2 Original research idea155

4.2 REVIEW OF PUBLIC HOUSING SUPPLY MODELSIN SEVERAL COUNTRIES155

4.2.1 Public housing supply model in China155

4.2.2 Public housing supply model in Japan157

4.2.3 Public housing supply model in the US159

4.2.4 Public housing supply model in the UK161

4.3 SUMMARIZATION OF VARIABIES FROM PUBLIC HOUSING SUPPLY MODELS163

4.3.1 Simplification of public housing supply models163

4.3.2 Variables summarized from the simplified public housing supply model165

4.3.3 Establishment of comparison items of variables167

4.4 EXTRACTION OF CORRELATED COMPONENTS IN THE PUBLIC HOUSING SUPPLY MODEL168

4.5 CHAPTER CONCLUSION170

Ⅲ COMPARISON ＆ REFERENCE173

CHAPTER 5 COMPASION OF PUBLIC HOUSING SUPPLY POLICY SYSTEM AND INSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM BETWEEN JAPAN AND CHINA175

5.1 CHAPTER INTRODUCTION175

5.1.1 Collection of secondary data and primarydata175

5.1.2 Original research idea177

5.2 OVERVIEW OF THE PUBLIC HOUSING SUPPLY POLICY IN JAPAN AND CHINA177

5.2.1 Characteristics of public housing policy177

5.2.2 Chronology of the public housing policy178

5.3 VERIFICATION OF THE REFERENCEABILITY OF JAPAN'S POLICY AND INSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM BASED ON"CIVIL LAW SYSTEM"185

5.3.1 Foundations of the"Civil Law System"in both Japan and China185

5.3.2 Hierarchical structe of policy system based on"Civil Law System"186

5.4 PENETRATION BY COMPARISON OF THE CURRENT STRUCTURE OF THE PUBLIC HOUSING SUPPLY POLICY SYSTEM WITH JAPAN186

5.4.1 Japan:hierarchy style187

5.4.2 China:Intersection style190

5.5 COMPARISON OF LEGISLATION OF PUBLIC HOUSING SUPPLY BETWEEN JAPAN AND CHINA192

5.5.1 Integrated policies and codes leading housing development192

5.5.2 Specific policies and acts for organization an dexecution196

5.6 COMPARISON OF THE SPECIFIC EXECUTED POLICY OF PUBLIC HOUSING SUPPLY BETWEEN JAPAN AND CHINA200

5.6.1 Financial assistance200

5.6.2 Housing source203

5.6.3 Residential Qualification205

5.6.4 Organization and execution process210

5.6.5 Comparison of organization and execution process214

5.7 COMPARISON OF INSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM OF PUBLIC HOUSING SUPPLY BETWEEN JAPAN AND CHINA215

5.7.1 Compositionofinstitutional systemofpublichousing supply215

5.7.2 Comparison of policy establishment institutional system218

5.7.3 Application of"Intermediary Agency"in executive institutional system219

5.7.4 Proposal of supervised institutional system in China223

5.8 CHAPTER CONCLUSION227

CHAPTER 6 COMPARISON OF PUBLIC HOUSING SUPPLY CAPACITY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN JAPAN AND CHINA231

6.1 CHAPTER INTRODUCTION231

6.1.1 Collection of secondary data and primary data231

6.1.2 Original research idea233

6.2 OVERVIEW OF THE INDUSTRIALIZED CONSTRUCTION METHOD IN JAPAN234

6.2.1 Concept of housing industrialization234

6.2.2 Origin of housing industrialization in Japan237

6.2.3 Characteristics of housing industrialization239

6.3 OVERVIEW OF LABOR-INTENSIVE CONSTRUCTION METHOD IN CHINA244

6.3.1 Cast-in site reinforced concrete construction245

6.3.2 Possibility of popularizing Japan's housing industrialization in China248

6.4 FEASIBILITY OF JAPAN'S HOUSING INDUSTRIALIZATION IN CHINA251

6.4.1 Components correlated with popularization of Japan's industrialized construction method251

6.4.2 Observation on the corresponding components in China to testify feasibility of Japan's housing industrialization258

6.5 ARGUMENT ON REFERENCEMETHOD OF JAPAN'S PUBLICHOUSING STRUCTURAL SYSTEM AND CONSTRUCTION METHOD FOR CHINA263

6.5.1 Overview of housing industrialization in China263

6.5.2 Comparison of public housing structal system and technique268

6.5.3 Componentization and modularity of public housing construction276

6.6 ARGUMENT ON REFERENCE METHOD OF JAPAN'S PUBLIC HOUSING STANDARDIZATION FOR CHINA280

6.6.1 Regulations correlated with public housing standardization280

6.6.2 Public housing standardized design in Japan284

6.6.3 Public housing design in China287

6.7 COMPARISON OF PUBLIC HOUSING STANDARDIZED DESIGN BY CASESTUDY292

6.7.1 Position of the case study292

6.7.2 Introduction of the"Vanhui Building"project293

6.7.3 Cornparison of housing standard within different dwelling layouts296

6.7.4 Comparison of housing standard between VH and Japan's standardized public housing299

6.8 CHAPTER CONCLUSION308

CHAPTER 7 COMPARISON OF THE TARGET OF PUBLIC HOUSING SUPPLY—LOW INCOME POPULATION IN METROPOLITAN AREAS IN JAPAN AND IN CHINA311

7.1 CHAPTER INTRODUCTION311

7.1.1 Collection of secondary data and primary data313

7.1.2 Original research idea313

7.1.3 Social survey of Beijing in China314

7.2 REVIEW OF THE EXISTING CONCEPT OF LOW INCOME POPULATION315

7.2.1 Academic interpretation in the world315

7.2.2 Concept of low income population in Japan317

7.2.3 Concept of low incomepo pulation in China318

7.2.4 Disadvantage of low income population concept based on income line320

7.3 COMPARISON BETWEEN JAPAN AND CHINA 1:SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION AND RESIDENTIAL FORM OF LOW INCOME POPULATION322

7.3.1 Spatial distribution and residential form of low income population in Japan323

7.3.2 Spatial distribution and residential form of low income population in China325

7.3.3 Comparative findings335

7.4 COMPARISSON BETWEEN JAPAN AND CHINA 2:PROPERTY OF THE LOW INCOME POPULATION338

7.4.1 The property of low income population in Japan338

7.4.2 The property of low income population in China340

7.4.3 Comparative findings347

7.5 COMPARISON BETWEEN JAPAN AND CHINA 3:RESIDENTIAL STATUS OF LOW INCOME POPULATION352

7.5.1 Theresidential status of low income population in Japan353

7.5.2 Theresidential status of low income population in China354

7.5.3 Comparison findings359

7.6 REFLECTION OF THE TARGET OF PUBLIC HOUSING SUPPLY IN CHINA364

7.6.1 Principle components correlated with low income population in China364

7.6.2 Re-orientation of public housing supply policy370

7.6.3 Residential requirement for public housing construction371

7.7 CHAPTER CONCLUSION375

Ⅳ CONCLUSION379

CHAPTER 8 CONCLUSION381

8.1 SUMMARY OF CHAPTER FINDINGS381

8.1.1 Referenceability of Japan's public housing supply system for China381

8.1.2 Discrepancy and problem of current public housing supply system in China by comparison with that in Japan384

8.1.3 Clarification of public housing supply target-the low income population in China388

8.2 FINAL CONCLUSION390

8.2.1 Public housing supply system in Japan391

8.2.2 Public housing supply system in China394

8.2.3 Differences and similarities by comparison of public housingsupply system of Japan and China397

8.2.4 Reasons for the differences and similarities of public housing supply system between Japan and China400

8.2.5 Recommendations for the public housing supply system in China402

8.3 FUTURE STUDIES404

8.3.1 Specific details under the orientation proposed in the book404

8.3.2 Study on more countries similar with China404

8.3.3 Internal mechanism of formulating public housing supply policy405

REFERENCES407

APPENDIX423